BG @ BrenTuning
04-25-2010, 09:15 PM
This one surprised me. As Cobb has noted these cars put down better numbers then the 09's stock. I'm going to baseline it again, but we were a little short on time today.
But here were the tuned results with a 10.6-10.7AFR, 16.8psi with taper, and conservative advance. This car could make a bit more power but the motor is still a bit "green."
AEM Intake: requires a good amount of scaling OL and CL on this particular car. But I was very impressed with the design of the heatshelid and the IAT's.
Fuel pump: These cars absolutely need a 255+ fuel pump bone stock - the pump simply can't keep up. I had to do alot of extra work to get it to play nice for now.
Also, I will note the ignition total timing does not follow what the car asks for in the 2010 definitions. There is definitely some additive table (Similar to previous years) you are fighting against that, at the moment, we can't see. You must compensate for it. Cobb may have an answer for this.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v412/brenwrx/stage12010wrx.jpg
But here were the tuned results with a 10.6-10.7AFR, 16.8psi with taper, and conservative advance. This car could make a bit more power but the motor is still a bit "green."
AEM Intake: requires a good amount of scaling OL and CL on this particular car. But I was very impressed with the design of the heatshelid and the IAT's.
Fuel pump: These cars absolutely need a 255+ fuel pump bone stock - the pump simply can't keep up. I had to do alot of extra work to get it to play nice for now.
Also, I will note the ignition total timing does not follow what the car asks for in the 2010 definitions. There is definitely some additive table (Similar to previous years) you are fighting against that, at the moment, we can't see. You must compensate for it. Cobb may have an answer for this.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v412/brenwrx/stage12010wrx.jpg